Jump to content

A New Group of Attention Seekers

BraddersTim

By BraddersTim
in The Haigh and Wright Suite

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Andyben
Andyben

Just had the misfortune to look at some of his replies  to people. His main gripe is 'Chansiri asked us to pay his tax bill'  Fucking hell. This is what you've brought us to @bazapeps ,

BraddersTim
BraddersTim

By your words you were one of the 3 founders (although you only admitted it after one fairly successful protest and the others had outed themselves). So you're responsible for the poor Comms from day

Andyben
Andyben

We have an exciting young management team. We are signing top drawer young players - our front four consists of players from Monaco, Barcelona, PSG & Chelsea. We finally have a defined p

Posted Images

mkowlthesexynewversion Andrew Wilson

mkowlthesexynewversion

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Billysboy said:

When has the club banned anybody for disagreeing with the owner? And likes been said in another post don't think that many of them attend anyway.

The irony of that is I can think of one place - rhymes with Owlstalk - where that applies.

Be interesting what the hypocritical fuckers view is on this club statement 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Billysboy John Sheridan

Billysboy

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, mkowlthesexynewversion said:

The irony of that is I can think of one place - rhymes with Owlstalk - where that applies.

Be interesting what the hypocritical fuckers view is on this club statement 

Know what you mean, let's people post what a despot, dictator Chansiri is whilst he tops the lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tylluan Andrew Wilson

Tylluan

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

think the vast majority are starting to realise that the guy is a fraud and chancer

Yep, just like the Glazers, saddling the club with debt and taking huge dividends out of it.

Just like Poundland mortgaging future payments to Macquarie so he could pay the bills (players still owed last season's promotion bonuses as well)

Just like the business model 777 are using to buy Everton before they flip the club for a profit but keep control of the new ground. 

Just like Carson Yeung, Owen Oyston, Vincent Tan, Roland Duchatelet, Craig Whyte, The Venkys, Sisu Capital (the list goes on and on)

I mean it's not like Chansiri has put something like £500m of his own money into the club since he came (please feel free to share any evidence of promissory notes or loan agreements, not noted in the accounts, that are held against the club for any repayment of the above). 

I'll be the first to agree he's had times when he's been extremely stupid and that his actions/outbursts have damaged club reputation but he's never refused to financially back the club when needed. He's also been naive when it comes to not understanding fans and he's also, at times, taken advice that may not have been right. 

But a fraud and a chancer? If you, Hargreaves, McClure, the Trust or any of the 1867 can provide evidence of fraudulent activity then I'm sure SYP and Chansiri's legal team would love to see it. 

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Winco Ron Springett

Winco

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Tylluan said:

Yep, just like the Glazers, saddling the club with debt and taking huge dividends out of it.

Just like Poundland mortgaging future payments to Macquarie so he could pay the bills (players still owed last season's promotion bonuses as well)

Just like the business model 777 are using to buy Everton before they flip the club for a profit but keep control of the new ground. 

Just like Carson Yeung, Owen Oyston, Vincent Tan, Roland Duchatelet, Craig Whyte, The Venkys, Sisu Capital (the list goes on and on)

I mean it's not like Chansiri has put something like £500m of his own money into the club since he came (please feel free to share any evidence of promissory notes or loan agreements, not noted in the accounts, that are held against the club for any repayment of the above). 

I'll be the first to agree he's had times when he's been extremely stupid and that his actions/outbursts have damaged club reputation but he's never refused to financially back the club when needed. He's also been naive when it comes to not understanding fans and he's also, at times, taken advice that may not have been right. 

But a fraud and a chancer? If you, Hargreaves, McClure, the Trust or any of the 1867 can provide evidence of fraudulent activity then I'm sure SYP and Chansiri's legal team would love to see it. 

 

Stick that on ya pioneers and spin em bartos!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Billysboy John Sheridan

Billysboy

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Tylluan said:

Yep, just like the Glazers, saddling the club with debt and taking huge dividends out of it.

Just like Poundland mortgaging future payments to Macquarie so he could pay the bills (players still owed last season's promotion bonuses as well)

Just like the business model 777 are using to buy Everton before they flip the club for a profit but keep control of the new ground. 

Just like Carson Yeung, Owen Oyston, Vincent Tan, Roland Duchatelet, Craig Whyte, The Venkys, Sisu Capital (the list goes on and on)

I mean it's not like Chansiri has put something like £500m of his own money into the club since he came (please feel free to share any evidence of promissory notes or loan agreements, not noted in the accounts, that are held against the club for any repayment of the above). 

I'll be the first to agree he's had times when he's been extremely stupid and that his actions/outbursts have damaged club reputation but he's never refused to financially back the club when needed. He's also been naive when it comes to not understanding fans and he's also, at times, taken advice that may not have been right. 

But a fraud and a chancer? If you, Hargreaves, McClure, the Trust or any of the 1867 can provide evidence of fraudulent activity then I'm sure SYP and Chansiri's legal team would love to see it. 

 

Apart from the racism, I think some of these making slanderous accusations are going to be in for a shock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andyben Andrew Wilson

Andyben

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

1) what have I accused him of? 
 

2) A sad state of affairs when fans would welcome legal action against fellow supporters. 
 

#chansiriout

1. Calling him a fraud in respect of how he runs the club and saying you wouldn't be surprised if he had commuted actual fraud.

 

2. Who said that? Just think it's worth a read and take care posting stuff. Don't want this site dragged into anything.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BraddersTim Derek Dooley

BraddersTim

Posted
  • Author
Posted
20 hours ago, Southy_SWFC said:

Not sure you can claim they've got bollocks when they won't even say who they are. 

This 100%.  When this is over and other folk have got into trouble with the club or police for doing what they've incited them to do, then maybe getting carried away and doing worse, this lot will slink back to their seats knowing that they're completely safe and anonymous.  Cowards.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Billysboy John Sheridan

Billysboy

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, BraddersTim said:

This 100%.  When this is over and other folk have got into trouble with the club or police for doing what they've incited them to do, then maybe getting carried away and doing worse, this lot will slink back to their seats knowing that they're completely safe and anonymous.  Cowards.

Wouldnt worry about that mate, from what I've read they sound about 11 year old, hardly fucking Baader - Meinhof are they.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mkowlthesexynewversion Andrew Wilson

mkowlthesexynewversion

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Beaconowl said:

MK, would it be fair to say though that without him there may not be a Club for us to support?

There would not be the current entity Sheffield Wednesday Football Club Limited to support no.

I would be 99.9% certain that there would be The Wednesday FC for us to shift our allegiance too. Like Bury did and a few others over the years.

Club to me is a hell of a lot more than the person who owns the shares that owns the golden share with the EFL.

And Chansiri will never own the spirit of the Club, the thing that is inside us 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beaconowl David Hirst

Beaconowl

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, mkowlthesexynewversion said:

There would not be the current entity Sheffield Wednesday Football Club Limited to support no.

I would be 99.9% certain that there would be The Wednesday FC for us to shift our allegiance too. Like Bury did and a few others over the years.

Club to me is a hell of a lot more than the person who owns the shares that owns the golden share with the EFL.

And Chansiri will never own the spirit of the Club, the thing that is inside us 

 

My thoughts entirely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tylluan Andrew Wilson

Tylluan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mkowlthesexynewversion said:

I would be 99.9% certain that there would be The Wednesday FC for us to shift our allegiance too. Like Bury did and a few others over the years.

Does anyone know if there's a current owner of 'The Wednesday FC" name? Would it still be the club?

And is the phoenixed Wednesday CC still going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Teddy Nickelarse John Sheridan

Teddy Nickelarse

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mkowlthesexynewversion said:

There would not be the current entity Sheffield Wednesday Football Club Limited to support no.

I would be 99.9% certain that there would be The Wednesday FC for us to shift our allegiance too. Like Bury did and a few others over the years.

Club to me is a hell of a lot more than the person who owns the shares that owns the golden share with the EFL.

And Chansiri will never own the spirit of the Club, the thing that is inside us 

 

Not sure personally.  156 years of tradition down the pan would likely kill the 'spirit' for many. 

Hope it never comes to that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andyben Andrew Wilson

Andyben

Posted
Posted

See, there actually is a big difference.

Southgate pretending to be a football manager isn't a crime, so there's no legal defamation when I call him a fraud.

This isn't the same as the accusations that DC is a fraud or has potentially committed fraudulent acts as owner of swfc, as alluded to above, either of which are crimes and to accuse someone of committing them is defamatory (either slander or possibly libel) which in itself leaves you open to criminal or civil proceedings.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mkowlthesexynewversion Andrew Wilson

mkowlthesexynewversion

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Teddy Nickelarse said:

Not sure personally.  156 years of tradition down the pan would likely kill the 'spirit' for many. 

Hope it never comes to that. 

But you don't lose that history. Ok DC technically owns it, but it's an intangible asset really. A new entity effectively inherits it.

I get that for some that it would be the end of the road, I accept it would never be the same, but look at Bury as your recent example of a club re-born 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JBO John Sheridan

JBO

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, mkowlthesexynewversion said:

Lets be honest DC is not the devil incarnate 

Equally if you consider his time running the Club has been successful and moved us forward, then I think you are as deluded as the protesters 

 

He's moved us significantly forward from where we would be right now if he hadn't bought the club

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HoylandOwl Andrew Wilson

HoylandOwl

Posted
Posted

I don't mind people protesting, it's their right to. My only objection to tonight was that it was done in the middle of the game, when we were getting some momentum at that point. It's all well and good people saying you can not support the chairman but support the team. Well how is it supporting the team if you're stopping them playing?

The Sky cameras were there, and while it obviously got some airtime and was discussed on the programme so I'm told, the group got what they wanted I would assume. Exposure. But could they not have done it pre game? As the players were coming out? The cameras were on then, there's no danger of interrupting a pen, or whatever is happening in the match. I think from the initial boos the actions got, from much of the crowd spoke more about the timing of it, than the act itself. 

I think his position is becoming more untenable by the game now, no matter what happens, it felt tonight a little like the tide is turning. Although, it has to be said the chants aimed at DC were louder on Saturday than they were tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...