Reesh Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 3 game ban Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wor-Jackie Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 This game is truely f@cked! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank_Owl2,0 Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 What a crock of sh1t. From the video clips I’ve seen he basically shrugs off the Ipswich lad who proceeds to make a meal of it. So we were punished in the game by them getting a pen and are punished again with a 3 game ban. At least James is back so hopefully it less of an impact - assuming we get no further injuries. Im sure there will be some that will say MJ was a silly boy for not thinking of the potential consequences, well yes but he hardly elbowed there player with any real force and I would hardly say he was violent. Further, I don’t know what the investigators have seen but if it’s nothing other than the official footage then what have they based their decision on - linemen that was at the other side of the pitch and couldn’t make out who actually did it! Another shambles of so called ‘justice’ in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul from Wisewood Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 Joke are they going to explain how they came to this decision 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 2 minutes ago, Paul from Wisewood said: Joke are they going to explain how they came to this decision They don’t need to and won’t. Its simple. Trial by mobile phone. And now I hope the floodgates open and everyone is done by fans moaning. Made a rod for their own backs here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank_Owl2,0 Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 I’m guessing they will just say; the officials knew what the offence was, they just needed to know who it was, which they figured out from the match highlights. No need to justify if there was an offence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkowlthesexynewversion Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 5 minutes ago, HoylandOwl said: They don’t need to and won’t. Its simple. Trial by mobile phone. And now I hope the floodgates open and everyone is done by fans moaning. Made a rod for their own backs here they will deny that arose - be a case that the lino saw this but could not be 100% certain of the player. The "mainstream" video camera then confirmed it was Johnson. And no not the mobile phone coverage But that is the open door here, get the camera phones ready Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank_Owl2,0 Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 (edited) I agree MK they’ll claim no other footage was used. Unfortunately that works against us in both ways not because we are unable to use fan footage to show how soft it was and second there is no official footage to show the same. Edited February 24, 2023 by Tank_Owl2,0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 https://www.swfc.co.uk/news/2023/february/club-statement_mjohnson/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaconowl Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 ***** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrolMong Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 Very dangerous precedent. Cue videos from Charlton on twitter of every foul committed on Aden Flint as he is wrestled to the ground at attacking corners. Based on todays ruling, it’s going to lead to referee suspensions and red cards being dished out to multiple players. And rightly so, if you are going to agree to suspend players based on fan footage, or disallow goals based on video screens - then you deal with the consequences of opening the doors. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laceups Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 Suitable replacement in James. Just no more injuries please. Shit decision but I’m not shocked. we must get out of this league this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owling_Wolf Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 Whatever games he misses, we win those games in his name. (On top of all the existing reasons.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bricat Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 The higher up the Football Admin ladder you go the more stupid, mentally unstable and dubious in intent , the officials appear to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank_Owl2,0 Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 One thing we know, DM will just get on with it. At the end of the day what choice does he/ we have. Best thing is to just make sure it doesn’t impact the focus of the team and maybe as Owling suggests make it a reason to be more resolute - if we even needed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAL Posted February 24, 2023 Share Posted February 24, 2023 My main problem with this (and it's a big problem as i see it, but they won't give a damn about that), is they have zero consistency and are absolutely bent. They go after teams they want to, but leave other favourite teams alone or even change the rules for them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted February 26, 2023 Share Posted February 26, 2023 DM has spoken about the suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owl71 Posted February 26, 2023 Share Posted February 26, 2023 Joke. The phone footage was from so far away, it was difficult to tell who was more at fault. I think we’ve all worked out that we’re not the EFL’s favourite club. Fuck you Parry, we’re going up as champions anyway. Oh and much respect to Real for the midweek performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reesh Posted March 6, 2023 Author Share Posted March 6, 2023 Grassing bastard https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/revealing-document-details-sheffield-wednesday-suspension-decision-how-ipswich-town-man-submitted-letter-4052580 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 So it turns out Wes Burns, the player who was so violently assaulted the officials didn’t know who it was…. Wrote to the EFL about Marvin’s action/reaction to him. What a snakey **** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 1 minute ago, Reesh said: Grassing bastard https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/revealing-document-details-sheffield-wednesday-suspension-decision-how-ipswich-town-man-submitted-letter-4052580 You beat me to it by about 10 seconds 😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCraigsOwl Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 47 minutes ago, HoylandOwl said: Wes Burns He may well do, if some nutter decides to take things too far 😯 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyben Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 Let's not descend to that level, not whilst there's poor sensitive souls like @pollhammer4around 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pollhammer4 Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 26 minutes ago, Andyben said: Let's not descend to that level, not whilst there's poor sensitive souls like @pollhammer4around Genuinely though, you’re the most ridiculous poster I’ve ever come across. Including owlstalk. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tylluan Posted March 6, 2023 Share Posted March 6, 2023 "On review of MOAS (Match Official Administration System) footage the player who committed the offence was No18 Marvin Johnson who would have been sent off for his actions" "After the Commission viewed all of the various video evidence and remained fully focussed on the actions of MJ throughout’, the following was decided:" All the various video evidence is a pretty damning sentence. The ref's saying he's reviewed the official footage and the panel are saying they've reviewed various footage. Unless there's an MOAS camera behind each goal (where the phone footage was taken from) then the official gantry camera picks up sod all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkowlthesexynewversion Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 This explanation was entirely predictable - all the official match coverage needed to show was the identity of our player. The laugh is that we have not really missed Johnson, Brown instead has come in and effectively set up the goals for the last 2 victories So fuck you Ipswich fans 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owling_Wolf Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 Those statements just sound like 'making the crime fit the punishment'. 👀 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 16 minutes ago, Owling_Wolf said: Those statements just sound like 'making the crime fit the punishment'. 👀 Absolutely that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 1 minute ago, holmesfield_owl said: There was a worse elbow this weekend, player already booked, ref saw it, got a warning. Bet fuck all happens with that Send the EFL footage. That’ll do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 Just now, holmesfield_owl said: It won't, it's official match footage, not from 30 ft behind the goal so doubt it counts 🤣 That’s fair comment. Let’s edit the footage, and start it with some ‘click and subscribe’ spiel at the start. That’ll do it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reesh Posted March 7, 2023 Author Share Posted March 7, 2023 Lets not be grasses eh lads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 There was match footage of the grassing top knotted tit elbowing Marvin in the same game. Odd how they tonally missed that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkowlthesexynewversion Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 It was interesting reading the full transcript. The officials say they use the match coverage to confirm it was Johnson. The tribunal state they use available video evidence, it does not say just the official match coverage Tbh they probably give 95% weight to the fact the officials saw it not just whom did it. They did give a penalty so did see it and the ref would have given a red at the time - just be grateful Ipswich didn't show a real time replay in the ground Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellsview Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 I just wish now that Marv had walked back up to him, whilst he was laid floundering on the ground, and kicked him in the bollocks! That would have been worth a 3 game ban. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAL Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 1 hour ago, Bellsview said: I just wish now that Marv had walked back up to him, whilst he was laid floundering on the ground, and kicked him in the bollocks! That would have been worth a 3 game ban. I just wish the wankers in charge had some decency and integrity. I absolutely hate the game as it is now, detest is probably a better word. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrolMong Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 Effectively, it’s now trial by ANY camera in the ground. Like I said at the time, very dangerous precedent. I am pretty certain I could get bans dished out to people defending against us from corners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoylandOwl Posted March 9, 2023 Share Posted March 9, 2023 20 hours ago, KrolMong said: Effectively, it’s now trial by ANY camera in the ground. Like I said at the time, very dangerous precedent. I am pretty certain I could get bans dished out to people defending against us from corners. You know what to do…. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reesh Posted March 9, 2023 Author Share Posted March 9, 2023 43 minutes ago, HoylandOwl said: You know what to do…. Not be grassing bastards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyben Posted March 9, 2023 Share Posted March 9, 2023 Snitches get stitches (in their ripped cardigans) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.