Prem League 1 Illegal Streaming 0

[mkowlthesexynewversion]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

Interesting news story that the EPL took this as a private prosecution and quite heavy sentences handed out

[HoylandOwl]

Interesting indeed. 
While that has points that state these services offer chances to see games that aren’t shown here. I’d say they’re more popular because they’re not £100+ a month!

[bricat]

Should apply to fans supplying their obviously biased videos to get someone suspended.

[Angelinblue]

I pay full price for BT and sky why shouldn't everybody else? Without this income there wouldn't be any product.

[Tylluan]

42 minutes ago, Angelinblue said:

I pay full price for BT and sky why shouldn't everybody else? Without this income there wouldn't be any product.

Sky sports subscription revenue is peanuts compared to generated advertising revenue. In 2019 Forbes ran a story saying that Sky Sports YouTube football channel took in a million dollars a month for all those 15 second ads you get before you watch a minute highlights. Then add on the Twitter revenue for the 30 second clips and your £20 a month means jack all. 

 

[Reesh]

53 minutes ago, Angelinblue said:

I pay full price for BT and sky why shouldn't everybody else? Without this income there wouldn't be any product.

Shut up love

[Reesh]

2 hours ago, mkowlthesexynewversion said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65697595

Interesting news story that the EPL took this as a private prosecution and quite heavy sentences handed out

Interesting that you get longer for selling streams than possessing indecent images of kids.

[Andyben]

Probably best to stream images f kids from now on then? 

[mkowlthesexynewversion]

1 hour ago, Reesh said:

Interesting that you get longer for selling streams than possessing indecent images of kids.

Yep I was surprised by the severity of the sentences handed down and indeed how piracy gets more jail time than aforementioned activity 

[Angelinblue]

On 30/05/2023 at 20:07, Neville Facking Bartos said:

Yes there would, the product (football) was around before Sky and them all it means is less money in the game. Currently thats not a bad thing as it’s not shared fairly and distributed to the right areas.

Me paying for IPTV is my way of protesting and telling them their prices are too high 

The broadcasting of football is the product, not football. If I bought gold jewellery off a bloke in the pub, would you believe it was a protest against the price of gold, or me trying to get something cheap, regardless of where it came from or if they were acting legally?

[Skamp]

Ridiculous analogy.

 

[Paul from Wisewood]

1 hour ago, Angelinblue said:

The broadcasting of football is the product, not football. If I bought gold jewellery off a bloke in the pub, would you believe it was a protest against the price of gold, or me trying to get something cheap, regardless of where it came from or if they were acting legally?

Id just assume you were a gypo 

[Reesh]

1 hour ago, Angelinblue said:

The broadcasting of football is the product, not football. If I bought gold jewellery off a bloke in the pub, would you believe it was a protest against the price of gold, or me trying to get something cheap, regardless of where it came from or if they were acting legally?

Aren't there some pots needing a wash?

[owl4ever1867]

Sky Sports, BT Sport, Amazon, Viaplay, its s rip off.

[Reesh]

Just now, owl4ever1867 said:

Sky Sports, BT Sport, Amazon, Viaplay, its s rip off.

Not with a firestick 

[owl4ever1867]

2 hours ago, Reesh said:

Not with a firestick 

True, which I've got 😎

[Paul from Wisewood]

On 03/06/2023 at 18:09, Reesh said:

Aren't there some pots needing a wash?

She’s too busy watching tv, making sure she gets her monies worth

[Angelinblue]

On 03/06/2023 at 16:06, Paul from Wisewood said:

Id just assume you were a gypo 

Thanks for your intellectual input.