SKY is getting worse . The Final was a new low ; we had
An instantly forgettable female anchor who asked all the same old banal questions
Barnsley pundit- a block of wood
Wednesday pundit Clinton Morrisson -the only ray of sunshine in this sorry bunch
Jobi McAnuff - another personality bypass straight out of the Jamie Redknapp school of the " Bleedin obvious "
I reckon Sky made more out of the so called penalty incident in order to generate a talking point in what was a rather mundane match . Sky seem to be getting more and more woke presenters who tick the boxes but are devoid of personality or knowledge of the game . Jeff Stelling replacement is bound to be a black , one legged lesbian
No arguement it was a sending off , the laws are quite clear . He lunges at Gregory . I think it is to deflect criticism from the Barnsley player who missed the best chance of the match in extra time . I don't think we would have come back from that if he had scored
Was in a bar in Vancouver early 90's had a Sheffield Wednesday sweatshirt . Just the name no logo . this thick girl comes up and says " What does Wed-nes-day mean " You couldn't make it up
Peterboro Pundit on BBC thought Ferguson panicked at half time and went all defensive . Bit rich from him complaining about added time should have a word with his keeper then . Reece James MOM
Talked with a tax expert yesterday he seems to think Lineker may have a hidden agenda . His court case with HMRC hinges on whether he is freelance he says he is ,HMRC say he isn't . Is he trying to back the BBC in to a corner to try and get them to strengthen his case as a freelancer
Lineker is like all critics of any Government - Very easy to Criticize but never come up with a workable solution . Just think of how many asylum seekers Gary could fund if he paid his taxes
To be honest we could do without most of the pundits as they are all from the school of the bleedin obvious , some are so clueless they have to be prompted by Lineker
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-64333540
Having first tried to get out of paying Nantes by saying Sala wasn't their player . They are now trying a different approach with their insurers . They tried to insurer him for £20 mill the day after his death . If your in a hole stop digging
The first instalment was for £5.3 mill which went up to £7 with interest .
I am a bit puzzled, surely Sala should have been insured by somebody . Nantes sold him so off their insurance but as Cardiff now saying that they didn't actually sign him he would not have been added to their insurance . Seems to be a fuck up all round