Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

Wigans last owner thought that was a good plan, left the new ones with the embargo for a longer period as punishment 

He’ll not give a fuck though once he’s left

Even if it gets paid it’s the destabilisation that pisses me off 

Depends who he's sold to and I assume the EFL have tweaked their rules after the Wigan debacle but let's not jump up and down just yet eh

Posted
18 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

At least they care and aren’t sat quietly hoping all will be ok 

Not jumping up and down, doesn’t mean you don’t care. 
And I’m not suggesting it’s not concerning either all this latest umbongo, it is. 
 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

At least they care and aren’t sat quietly hoping all will be ok 

Promoting the fake yank is the literal equivalent of pointing your brother to a loan shark because he can't pay his mortgage.

Posted
3 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

True but I don’t think it’s right that those people attack those prepared to stick their head above the parapet 

Depends how they go about it 

Posted
3 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

If that’s what’s this is all about then he’s a full weight **** 

It’s not though, he’s struggling for funds. Even if he sorts this it’s only kicking the can down the road 

And you know this how? Or is it supposition on your part?

Posted
6 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

True but I don’t think it’s right that those people attack those prepared to stick their head above the parapet 

But they haven't stuck their head above the parapet have they, that's why they get stick.

They are still sat in their nice banqueting hall, feasting on their own egos, whilst trying to get everybody else to put their head above the parapet. 

But it's backfired "again" because the people they brought in as their minions worked them a powder and made them look even more unqualified to make decisions.

They have set up to make a fuss about how the chairman can't run the club. 

Yet these 3 "yes three" can't even run their own operation of 9 "nine".

Then they are promoting a bloke who hasn't even paid his dues to the bloke they are slagging off. 

Unbelievable Jeff. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

If that’s what’s this is all about then he’s a full weight **** 

It’s not though, he’s struggling for funds. Even if he sorts this it’s only kicking the can down the road 

But isn’t there a very good argument that they have triggered all this by antagonising the sole source of funding of the club? Everyone has seen how Chansiri reacts to things, this was always a very likely outcome of the protests and plenty of us were saying it.

And that’s not the same as backing Chansiri, personally I’m pissed off with him and the protesters, they are both at fault. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

True but I don’t think it’s right that those people attack those prepared to stick their head above the parapet 

I’ve not done that. So. I’m ok. 🤣

Posted
3 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said:

 

Apparently out last goal was the tennis ball game, might not be a bad idea after all 😂

Weren’t we leading at the time of the tennis balls?

Such a long time ago I’m not certain. But if I’m right, surely that points against more tennis balls as the last one led to our goalless run?

Posted
24 minutes ago, M42Owl said:

Weren’t we leading at the time of the tennis balls?

Such a long time ago I’m not certain. But if I’m right, surely that points against more tennis balls as the last one led to our goalless run?

No we were playing well then they disrupted momentum but we got it back through Musaba's goal.

  • Like 1
Posted

It's a dichotomy. However much I consider Chansiri's running of the Club is shite, I find these groups circling around just as piss poor 

The 1867 Group statement was shockingly bad 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, mkowl said:

It's a dichotomy. However much I consider Chansiri's running of the Club is shite, I find these groups circling around just as piss poor 

The 1867 Group statement was shockingly bad 

I find it ironic that one of the accusations chucked at Chansiri is he frequently posts long rambling statements, bringing up issues of the past that should be left alone…

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, LiamOwl said:

You’d think a group that’s trying to engage people and generate support might consider it important that people can read the endless shite that they post. 

And not make it longer than War and Peace.

Posted (edited)

Grammar

Engaging content

Not finding an alternative word for the U word

Not including Owlsonline

 

Being egotistical dicks

Edited by Skamp
Being egotistical and not checking my grammar before I post. Oh, hang on …
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HoylandOwl said:

 

26,000 supporters on Sunday, 24,000 views on Twitter yet only 108 likes. The revamped fan engagement has started well. 

Board? Membership? Donations? This smacks of Trust MK2 and they've been extraordinarily quiet through all the recent negative club activity. 

At the moment they say they're staying faceless but that statement mentions members within Stalk, Wednesdayite, podcasters, they even mention support from within the Trust. It wouldn't be hard to start naming the usual suspects. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Tylluan said:

26,000 supporters on Sunday, 24,000 views on Twitter yet only 108 likes. The revamped fan engagement has started well. 

Board? Membership? Donations? This smacks of Trust MK2 and they've been extraordinarily quiet through all the recent negative club activity. 

At the moment they say they're staying faceless but that statement mentions members within Stalk, Wednesdayite, podcasters, they even mention support from within the Trust. It wouldn't be hard to start naming the usual suspects. 

 

Didn't the Supporters Trust make some coment the other day or did I imagine that

 

Posted

You see, this is how thick they are.

 

It’s UNDERINVESTMENT, one word. Otherwise someone or something would be under an investment. 
 

If they would like a proofreader, happy to oblige. 

Posted

I have just posted this in a thread that's on going but thought no harm in making a new thread so as many people as possible can see it.  

 

The Trust held a meeting last night with a few other fan groups, Clive Betts MP and Jane Hughes of the Football Supporters Association (FSA).   We discussed the idea to organise an umbrella group of fan groups to agree on a consensus response to this on going situation of worrying statements.  We have agreed to put a list together of all the fan groups we know of with the intention of inviting all groups, reps, etc to an initial meeting.  The trust agreed with the FSA they would provide advice on how to coordinate / go forward with this before we actually meet.  Hopefully this will mean the umbrella group will meet requirements of the new football regulator that is in the offing and can act as the fan group that represents the widest possible number of us for the foreseeable future.  The idea being the Umbrella group has defined shared purpose that hopefully we can get consensus on but each group will keep their own identity and be able to campaign for their particular focus.  

 

The trust are keen for all group reps and people keen to get involved to get in touch through our [email protected] email.  UTO

Posted

@EBRA

Our supporters groups are too fractured to get this off the ground. The first meeting would be like the People's Front of Judea and the Judea People's Front 

The club has tried to bring fans groups together with their revamped fans forums. Before the first meeting, and every meeting after, Chansiri and Dooley asked that the attending groups got their heads together first and came up with relevant items to discuss and ideas to move the club forward. It's plain to see from the write ups that this didn't happen. Each group had its own agenda. I know of one invited group that declined and two that didn't fully canvas membership on what to bring. The Trust also lost their place at that table after it was put to a vote to ask them to leave. 

The best example of an umbrella group is Derby's. They originally all came together for charitable fundraising, under the Derby Sikh supporters group, then turned it up a notch under administration. But even then it was only to firm a united front to raise funds to keep stuff like the kids football going. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

That sort of brings memories back to 2010 when there was an actual meeting of fans groups. Not long after the defeat to Palace and relegation. I attended on behalf of Owlsonline with Moz and Lisa iirc. I had posted on here about the potential for fan ownership, others had mooted it as well. 

To a fashion it worked OK, it spawned WTID and the key thing was that egos were left at the door (even me). It was there I learned about the financial concerns, it helped one worked in insolvency and what turned out to be true rumours were noted to the meeting by him. So WTID came to fore front a bit more.

I took more of a back seat as time progressed, geography in part, the shit show of my work that mirrored  the mess at S6 the other. I still remember posting a "takeover completed" story the day I bought this business. 

So I won't criticise their intentions because why not if you feel passionate about how the club is run, indeed will it survive. 

Posted

@TylluanI don't disagree and even as Rome was burning in 2010 certain organisations - lets call them Wednesdayite - were still about the process. Its on the agenda for our next meeting in a week below (this is genuine) what shade of blue should we use.

Tbh I really struggled with that, I work with clients where doing it yesterday is too late. I was banned from shooting from the hip on forums, not always successfully. 

WTID worked to a fashion. It had a meeting with the Coop, Mandaric advisors were monitoring us. I am not sure but one of our cohort was certain it forced Mandaric to make the offer pre admin not post that arising.

But it will flounder because you have the working mens club committee attitude clashing with my type that gets on with it and cares Jack shit about box ticking

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, mkowl said:

That sort of brings memories back to 2010 when there was an actual meeting of fans groups. Not long after the defeat to Palace and relegation. I attended on behalf of Owlsonline with Moz and Lisa iirc. I had posted on here about the potential for fan ownership, others had mooted it as well. 

To a fashion it worked OK, it spawned WTID and the key thing was that egos were left at the door (even me). It was there I learned about the financial concerns, it helped one worked in insolvency and what turned out to be true rumours were noted to the meeting by him. So WTID came to fore front a bit more.

I took more of a back seat as time progressed, geography in part, the shit show of my work that mirrored  the mess at S6 the other. I still remember posting a "takeover completed" story the day I bought this business. 

So I won't criticise their intentions because why not if you feel passionate about how the club is run, indeed will it survive. 

 

We didn't lose to Palace!!

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Reesh said:

 

We didn't lose to Palace!!

 

 

It felt like it tbf - but yes we did draw but the scrawny scouse git ducking a header is an abiding memory 

Posted
8 minutes ago, mkowl said:

It felt like it tbf - but yes we did draw but the scrawny scouse git ducking a header is an abiding memory 

He'd have been forgiven had he just dived for it.  **** cvnt çűñṭ. Doesn't matter how you put it, he's a ****

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...