Reesh Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 2 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: Wigans last owner thought that was a good plan, left the new ones with the embargo for a longer period as punishment He’ll not give a fuck though once he’s left Even if it gets paid it’s the destabilisation that pisses me off Depends who he's sold to and I assume the EFL have tweaked their rules after the Wigan debacle but let's not jump up and down just yet eh Quote
BraddersTim Posted October 27, 2023 Author Posted October 27, 2023 So now they're blaming all the shit stuff they did on 6 new people that came in to help them and saying the 3 original people are back in charge. Absolute weapons. 1 Quote
BraddersTim Posted October 27, 2023 Author Posted October 27, 2023 They're promoting Shaw as the potential buyer FFS. 1 Quote
Billysboy Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 "We weren't entirely truthful with you all regarding this group" Start a statement with that yer fucked in my eyes, pathetic. 1 Quote
HoylandOwl Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 18 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: At least they care and aren’t sat quietly hoping all will be ok Not jumping up and down, doesn’t mean you don’t care. And I’m not suggesting it’s not concerning either all this latest umbongo, it is. Quote
Otto_Man Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 25 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: At least they care and aren’t sat quietly hoping all will be ok Promoting the fake yank is the literal equivalent of pointing your brother to a loan shark because he can't pay his mortgage. Quote
Southy_SWFC Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 It's almost as if DC warned us that he wouldn't be spending any more money. 1 Quote
Reesh Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 3 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: True but I don’t think it’s right that those people attack those prepared to stick their head above the parapet Depends how they go about it Quote
Reesh Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 3 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: If that’s what’s this is all about then he’s a full weight **** It’s not though, he’s struggling for funds. Even if he sorts this it’s only kicking the can down the road And you know this how? Or is it supposition on your part? Quote
MAL Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 6 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: True but I don’t think it’s right that those people attack those prepared to stick their head above the parapet But they haven't stuck their head above the parapet have they, that's why they get stick. They are still sat in their nice banqueting hall, feasting on their own egos, whilst trying to get everybody else to put their head above the parapet. But it's backfired "again" because the people they brought in as their minions worked them a powder and made them look even more unqualified to make decisions. They have set up to make a fuss about how the chairman can't run the club. Yet these 3 "yes three" can't even run their own operation of 9 "nine". Then they are promoting a bloke who hasn't even paid his dues to the bloke they are slagging off. Unbelievable Jeff. 1 Quote
Chelters Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 8 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: If that’s what’s this is all about then he’s a full weight **** It’s not though, he’s struggling for funds. Even if he sorts this it’s only kicking the can down the road But isn’t there a very good argument that they have triggered all this by antagonising the sole source of funding of the club? Everyone has seen how Chansiri reacts to things, this was always a very likely outcome of the protests and plenty of us were saying it. And that’s not the same as backing Chansiri, personally I’m pissed off with him and the protesters, they are both at fault. 1 Quote
HoylandOwl Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 9 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: True but I don’t think it’s right that those people attack those prepared to stick their head above the parapet I’ve not done that. So. I’m ok. 🤣 Quote
M42Owl Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 3 hours ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: Apparently out last goal was the tennis ball game, might not be a bad idea after all 😂 Weren’t we leading at the time of the tennis balls? Such a long time ago I’m not certain. But if I’m right, surely that points against more tennis balls as the last one led to our goalless run? Quote
Reesh Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 24 minutes ago, M42Owl said: Weren’t we leading at the time of the tennis balls? Such a long time ago I’m not certain. But if I’m right, surely that points against more tennis balls as the last one led to our goalless run? No we were playing well then they disrupted momentum but we got it back through Musaba's goal. 1 Quote
mkowl Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 It's a dichotomy. However much I consider Chansiri's running of the Club is shite, I find these groups circling around just as piss poor The 1867 Group statement was shockingly bad 1 Quote
LiamOwl Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 4 minutes ago, mkowl said: It's a dichotomy. However much I consider Chansiri's running of the Club is shite, I find these groups circling around just as piss poor The 1867 Group statement was shockingly bad I find it ironic that one of the accusations chucked at Chansiri is he frequently posts long rambling statements, bringing up issues of the past that should be left alone… 1 Quote
LiamOwl Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 Similar to those begging for Red Bull, but who lost their minds when the stripes changed width and he used a different badge. Quote
HoylandOwl Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 15 hours ago, BraddersTim said: They're promoting Shaw as the potential buyer FFS. Have they? Not seen it on their feed? Where'd they say that? Quote
Otto_Man Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 Wouldn't it be ironic if the reason we hadn't paid the HMRC monies was because the fake yank hasn't paid his bill...? 3 Quote
BraddersTim Posted October 29, 2023 Author Posted October 29, 2023 23 hours ago, HoylandOwl said: Have they? Not seen it on their feed? Where'd they say that? No they haven't, it was me being a fuckwit, reply was from a different username. 1 Quote
HoylandOwl Posted October 29, 2023 Posted October 29, 2023 48 minutes ago, BraddersTim said: No they haven't, it was me being a fuckwit, reply was from a different username. Ah ok. Fuckwit. 🤣 1 Quote
EBRA Posted October 29, 2023 Posted October 29, 2023 That group is spouting more nonsense on X .. really wish they would of one! Quote
LiamOwl Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 You’d think a group that’s trying to engage people and generate support might consider it important that people can read the endless shite that they post. 2 Quote
Reesh Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 Board decision on protests without telling us who is on the board, mongs. 1 Quote
Reesh Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 Just now, LiamOwl said: You’d think a group that’s trying to engage people and generate support might consider it important that people can read the endless shite that they post. And not make it longer than War and Peace. Quote
LiamOwl Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 “We aim to be a united voice for Wednesday supporters” 1 1 Quote
Reesh Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 10 minutes ago, LiamOwl said: “We aim to be a united voice for Wednesday supporters” Drawbs 2 Quote
Andyben Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 18 minutes ago, LiamOwl said: “We aim to be a united voice for Wednesday supporters” They're definitely United 1 Quote
Skamp Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 (edited) Grammar ❌ Engaging content ❌ Not finding an alternative word for the U word ❌ Not including Owlsonline ❌ Being egotistical dicks ✅ Edited October 30, 2023 by Skamp Being egotistical and not checking my grammar before I post. Oh, hang on … 1 Quote
Tylluan Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 1 hour ago, HoylandOwl said: 26,000 supporters on Sunday, 24,000 views on Twitter yet only 108 likes. The revamped fan engagement has started well. Board? Membership? Donations? This smacks of Trust MK2 and they've been extraordinarily quiet through all the recent negative club activity. At the moment they say they're staying faceless but that statement mentions members within Stalk, Wednesdayite, podcasters, they even mention support from within the Trust. It wouldn't be hard to start naming the usual suspects. Quote
mkowl Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 1 minute ago, Tylluan said: 26,000 supporters on Sunday, 24,000 views on Twitter yet only 108 likes. The revamped fan engagement has started well. Board? Membership? Donations? This smacks of Trust MK2 and they've been extraordinarily quiet through all the recent negative club activity. At the moment they say they're staying faceless but that statement mentions members within Stalk, Wednesdayite, podcasters, they even mention support from within the Trust. It wouldn't be hard to start naming the usual suspects. Didn't the Supporters Trust make some coment the other day or did I imagine that Quote
Reesh Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 "Under investment in the academy" That is actually lies and very libellous 2 Quote
Skamp Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 You see, this is how thick they are. It’s UNDERINVESTMENT, one word. Otherwise someone or something would be under an investment. If they would like a proofreader, happy to oblige. Quote
Billysboy Posted October 30, 2023 Posted October 30, 2023 I reckon they've taken about a fortnight to compose that, going over it again and again, letting Nige have a look when he's done his shift at B&M and still fuck up. Quote
star Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, mkowl said: Didn't the Supporters Trust make some coment the other day or did I imagine that Yes they did, saw it posted somewhre else but can't remember where. https://www.swfctrust.co.uk/news/october-update-59e9k Edited October 31, 2023 by star Quote
80s Owl Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 It's time for the singer and Hargreaves to cough up 🤣 Quote
Ozzie Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 (edited) Anyone seen that muppet Worko on Youtube? Blubbing and telling DC to leave. Saaaaaad Edited October 31, 2023 by Ozzie Quote
EBRA Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 I have just posted this in a thread that's on going but thought no harm in making a new thread so as many people as possible can see it. The Trust held a meeting last night with a few other fan groups, Clive Betts MP and Jane Hughes of the Football Supporters Association (FSA). We discussed the idea to organise an umbrella group of fan groups to agree on a consensus response to this on going situation of worrying statements. We have agreed to put a list together of all the fan groups we know of with the intention of inviting all groups, reps, etc to an initial meeting. The trust agreed with the FSA they would provide advice on how to coordinate / go forward with this before we actually meet. Hopefully this will mean the umbrella group will meet requirements of the new football regulator that is in the offing and can act as the fan group that represents the widest possible number of us for the foreseeable future. The idea being the Umbrella group has defined shared purpose that hopefully we can get consensus on but each group will keep their own identity and be able to campaign for their particular focus. The trust are keen for all group reps and people keen to get involved to get in touch through our [email protected] email. UTO Quote
Tylluan Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 @EBRA Our supporters groups are too fractured to get this off the ground. The first meeting would be like the People's Front of Judea and the Judea People's Front The club has tried to bring fans groups together with their revamped fans forums. Before the first meeting, and every meeting after, Chansiri and Dooley asked that the attending groups got their heads together first and came up with relevant items to discuss and ideas to move the club forward. It's plain to see from the write ups that this didn't happen. Each group had its own agenda. I know of one invited group that declined and two that didn't fully canvas membership on what to bring. The Trust also lost their place at that table after it was put to a vote to ask them to leave. The best example of an umbrella group is Derby's. They originally all came together for charitable fundraising, under the Derby Sikh supporters group, then turned it up a notch under administration. But even then it was only to firm a united front to raise funds to keep stuff like the kids football going. 1 Quote
mkowl Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 That sort of brings memories back to 2010 when there was an actual meeting of fans groups. Not long after the defeat to Palace and relegation. I attended on behalf of Owlsonline with Moz and Lisa iirc. I had posted on here about the potential for fan ownership, others had mooted it as well. To a fashion it worked OK, it spawned WTID and the key thing was that egos were left at the door (even me). It was there I learned about the financial concerns, it helped one worked in insolvency and what turned out to be true rumours were noted to the meeting by him. So WTID came to fore front a bit more. I took more of a back seat as time progressed, geography in part, the shit show of my work that mirrored the mess at S6 the other. I still remember posting a "takeover completed" story the day I bought this business. So I won't criticise their intentions because why not if you feel passionate about how the club is run, indeed will it survive. Quote
mkowl Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 @TylluanI don't disagree and even as Rome was burning in 2010 certain organisations - lets call them Wednesdayite - were still about the process. Its on the agenda for our next meeting in a week below (this is genuine) what shade of blue should we use. Tbh I really struggled with that, I work with clients where doing it yesterday is too late. I was banned from shooting from the hip on forums, not always successfully. WTID worked to a fashion. It had a meeting with the Coop, Mandaric advisors were monitoring us. I am not sure but one of our cohort was certain it forced Mandaric to make the offer pre admin not post that arising. But it will flounder because you have the working mens club committee attitude clashing with my type that gets on with it and cares Jack shit about box ticking 1 Quote
Andyben Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 All irrelevant apart from flagging to me who needs banning 1 Quote
Reesh Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 19 minutes ago, mkowl said: That sort of brings memories back to 2010 when there was an actual meeting of fans groups. Not long after the defeat to Palace and relegation. I attended on behalf of Owlsonline with Moz and Lisa iirc. I had posted on here about the potential for fan ownership, others had mooted it as well. To a fashion it worked OK, it spawned WTID and the key thing was that egos were left at the door (even me). It was there I learned about the financial concerns, it helped one worked in insolvency and what turned out to be true rumours were noted to the meeting by him. So WTID came to fore front a bit more. I took more of a back seat as time progressed, geography in part, the shit show of my work that mirrored the mess at S6 the other. I still remember posting a "takeover completed" story the day I bought this business. So I won't criticise their intentions because why not if you feel passionate about how the club is run, indeed will it survive. We didn't lose to Palace!! Quote
Reesh Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 2 minutes ago, Andyben said: All irrelevant apart from flagging to me who needs banning Andy knows! Quote
Otto_Man Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 The group will never truly represent the fan base because anyone who is broadly in favour of allowing DC to carry on won't be included in the conversation. 5 Quote
mkowl Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 10 minutes ago, Reesh said: We didn't lose to Palace!! It felt like it tbf - but yes we did draw but the scrawny scouse git ducking a header is an abiding memory Quote
Skamp Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 8 minutes ago, mkowl said: It felt like it tbf - but yes we did draw but the scrawny scouse git ducking a header is an abiding memory He'd have been forgiven had he just dived for it. **** cvnt çűñṭ. Doesn't matter how you put it, he's a **** Quote
Reesh Posted November 3, 2023 Posted November 3, 2023 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Neville Facking Bartos said: FullSizeRender.MOV 2.86 MB · 2 downloads Here he is Citizen Smith/Dan Brown! Edited November 3, 2023 by Reesh Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.